Join us and get access to thousands of tutorials and a community of expert Pythonistas.

Unlock This Lesson

This lesson is for members only. Join us and get access to thousands of tutorials and a community of expert Pythonistas.

Unlock This Lesson

Hint: You can adjust the default video playback speed in your account settings.
Hint: You can set your subtitle preferences in your account settings.
Sorry! Looks like there’s an issue with video playback 🙁 This might be due to a temporary outage or because of a configuration issue with your browser. Please refer to our video player troubleshooting guide for assistance.

Introducing the super() Function

00:00 Sometimes you want to override a certain method, but maybe you just want to add a bit to the end or to the beginning. You don’t want to just override the whole thing, especially if the method is quite large.

00:12 The super() function allows you to access the original method of the parent class while you’re still overriding it in your subclass. So to put that in a slightly different way, sometimes you need to extend a certain method, and within that method, you can call the parent class’s method with the super() function.

00:32 This is very common to see in an .__init__() constructor. For example, you’ll recognize most of this code from previous lessons.

00:43 You’ve got your custom exception up here. You’ve got your Point class, which has been abbreviated here, just so it all fits on the screen. You’ve got your Shape class, which has a space here for something that we’re going to add in in a second.

00:57 Then you’ve got your Square class, which subclasses Shape and adds in this check here to make sure that it has four points. But this code currently has a problem.

01:09 You accept a list of points as the attribute that goes to self.points—same here—and you’re checking if the length is 4. There should be four points for a square. That makes sense.

01:22 But someone could pass in a list of numbers or strings, and as long as there are four of them, that would still work. So you really want to add in a check here to make sure each of them are points.

01:33 You might do this by saying for point in points: if not isinstance(point, Point), then you can raise a TypeError. We’re not subclassing this because the TypeError is quite a common type of error.

01:47 You often pass in the wrong type to a function, and in this case, that’s what’s happening here. If all the points are not instances of the Point class, then they should raise a TypeError.

02:00 But now, the way you’ve currently got it set up, you’d have to copy this check into here before or after.

02:10 That’s not ideal because then we’re just copying code, which is one of the big reasons we learn how to code is to not repeat ourselves. So what you can do is use the super() function.

02:21 You’ll see that this line here has now changed.

02:25 Instead of self.points = points, you’re calling super().__init__(points). What’s happening here? super() is like a reference to the parent, and then it’s saying, okay, get the parent, and then get the .__init__() method from the parent here, and then we’ll pass in the points to that function.

02:53 Basically, this is like just adding this check before this check.

03:00 You could put the super() beforehand. That would also work. But it makes sense to have it after because we want to make sure that we’ve gone through all the checks before we assign the points to the instance as an attribute, namely that the code has checked whether the number of points is 4 and then whether all the points are actually instances of the Point class, and finally assign the points to the instance.

03:26 Let’s look at that in action. With this code loaded up, you can see that the Square shape has the super() call in it, but if we were to revert this and put this back into self.points, so it’s not using the super() function, this is no longer paying attention to the check to make sure all the points are actually instances of the Point class.

03:52 You can verify this by maybe creating an instance of Square, and instead of passing four points, we’ll just pass in four ones, four integers.

04:02 There are four of them, but they’re not points. So this shouldn’t really be a valid shape. Control + S to save it, and then F5 to run it.

04:11 You’ll see that it creates without any errors, and if you look at box, you’ll see that it’s a Square object, but if you look at the points, then you’ll see that this is just a list of numbers, not of points.

04:24 So we really want to catch this. The naive way might be to just copy and paste all of this into here. Now this won’t run. If I press Control + S and then F5 to run it, I’ll get an error. It’s saying all points should be members of the Point class, so that works. But we’re duplicating code here, and we don’t need to.

04:44 What we can do instead is add our check and then call this constructor method as if it was part of this method. And the way you can do that is with the super() function.

04:59 So super(), that grabs the original class, then we reference the .__init__() constructor method, then we pass in the arguments that would be passed into that.

05:12 So we can pass in the points. So we’re getting the points that were originally passed in, we’re checking to make sure there are four, and then we’re passing it to the original constructor here, and then that becomes the points here.

05:25 Then self.points gets assigned to the instance as if it were in here.

05:32 So now if we save and run, you’ll see that we get the TypeError still, even though we don’t have it in this function. So the way to fix this would be to replace all of these with points.

05:56 Say (0, 0) … do a bit of copy/pasting …

06:03 make that (0, 1), (1, 1), (1, 0). Okay, so now we Control + S to save that and then F5 to run it, and we’re not getting any errors. And if we look at our box, we’ll see that it’s a Square object, and if we look at our points within that box, we can see that we have four Point objects in there.

06:26 So that’s the super() function. It doesn’t work just for the constructor. You can call any method that is on the parent class with the super() function.

06:37 The super() function can be quite confusing, so don’t worry if you don’t get it all just yet. There’s plenty more material to go through if you want to know more about super().

Ash D on Dec. 12, 2023

I guess you could also take the code de-duplication further by moving the point-quantity checking code into the parent class. Here’s how I think this could be done:

class WrongNumberOfPoints(Exception):
    pass

class Point:
    def __init__(self, x, y):
        self.x = x
        self.y = y

class Shape:
    def __init__(self, points, num_points):
        self.num_points = num_points
        for point in points:
            if not isinstance(point, Point):
                raise TypeError("your error message here")
        if len(points) != self.num_points:
            raise WrongNumberOfPoints
        self.points = points

class Square(Shape):
    NUM_POINTS = 4
    def __init__(self, points):
        super().__init__(points, Square.NUM_POINTS)

class Pentagon(Shape):
    NUM_POINTS = 5
    def __init__(self, points):
        super().__init__(points, Pentagon.NUM_POINTS)

In Shape’s __init__, num_points could either be left as is, or could possibly be made safer by setting it to a default of None, so that it’s an optional argument, in case anyone ever instantiates Shape directly. It depends on whether the Shape class is ever likely to be instantiated directly, or if it will only ever be inherited from.

Is this valid / worth doing?

Become a Member to join the conversation.